|
UMMA PARTY MEMORANDUM
HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION
MARCH 2001
Theoretically, the Human Rights
situation has changed for the better in the Sudan. The Regime
accepts political plurality, it accepts Religious freedom, it
accepts the need to respect Human Rights and Basic Freedoms.
Secondly, the regime has
effectively withdrawn its Ideological Islamicist Agenda and now
speaks a different ideological language, namely, that citizenship
shall be the basis for Constitutional Rights, that the country’s
unity will be based upon a voluntary basis, that Government shall be
based upon peaceful succession through free and fair elections, that
Regional relations shall be based upon good neighborliness, and that
International Relations shall be based upon International Peace and
cooperation.
Such developments should be
recognized and encouraged.
However, in practice there are
several setbacks for two basic reasons:
First
Reason: The new policy has not yet spread to the whole system,
so that there are parts of the system, which find themselves more at
home with the Totalitarian practice.
Second
Reason: The fact that there is a continuous war, that some
political elements consort with armed groups, and that the break-
away NPC (Dr. Turabi’s Party) continues to challenge the ruling
party to a show down, such considerations have provided the security
institutions with justifications for their measures.
We outline here the main
setback aspects:
1.
The prolongation of the State of Emergency
for another year. This measure, concerning the areas where there are
no military operations, is unjustifiable.
2.
The General Elections of December 2000 are non-
elections. They have no democratic value. They simply mean that the
Regime has re-elected itself. Their only justification is that the
Regime needed to complete its constitutional institutions, and to
prevent the emergence of a Constitutional Vacuum. For this
justification to be acceptable, the Regime should declare its
intention to hold a New General Election as soon as a Comprehensive
Political Agreement is in place. Further they may use the Assembly
to enact the equired democratic reforms.
3.
Press Freedom:
Press
Freedom has been abused in several ways, namely:
o
Confiscation of papers from the press
if they contain material, which does not please security officers.
The legal body responsible for overseeing the Press is the Press
Council and not the security officers.
o
The instruction in the last minute to
delete certain items, for example, ALKHARTOUM of 11/3/2000.
o
Summoning editors to be interrogated
by security, for example, ALFRED TABAN, ALBINU OKINI, MAHJOUB
MOHAMMAD SALIH.
o
Daily visits to the different papers
by way of scrutiny.
o
Intimidation and threats of arrests,
and actual arrets.
o
The instructions by Security that
certain subjects are not for publication, namely,
§
News about the NPC.
§
Trade union elections.
§
The UN envoy on Human Rights.
o
The Journal RAY Al SHAAB has been shut
down without any legal procedure.
4.
Several Students from a number of Universities have
been dismissed for no good reason. The number now is about 500.
Students have many justifiable grievances because Higher Education
in Sudan has been increased a 1000% in two years without
accompanying resources. Campus Student Unions have been suppressed.
5.
There have been several political arrests:
o
Some, for example, the two lawyers
Ghazi Suleiman, and Ali Mahmoud, were arrests without trial.
o
Some have been arrests pending trial,
namely, the NDA Secretariat, and the leader and cadres of the NPC.
6.
The Governor of Khartoum issued in September 2000 a
regulation, which prohibited women to work in certain activities,
viz, pump stations, Hotels, Restaurants, and coffee shops. This
regulation is discriminatory in terms of Human Rights, and
unconstitutional.
7.
There has been bombing of civilian targets in the
course of the current civil war.
8.
At some point in the past, there were policies,
which through JIHAD, and militia activity led to captivation of
fighters and inhuman treatment. However, the much-publicized
accusation of slavery is based on disinformation, especially after
the initiation of the new policies since 1998. Intertribal abuse of
Human Rights does exist. Some Missionary activists have used the
fall out from the old policies, and the tribal abuses, to build a
case for legalized slavery in Sudan to justify pressure
against Sudan Government, and to capture more resources for their
activity.
9.
Several restrictive laws are still in place, and
could be activated, if necessary.
In spite of these setbacks,
there is greater recognition of political plurality in Sudan than in
many “South World” countries. There is also a higher level of
transparency, for example, access given to the International media,
and the approval for a permanent UN Commission of Human Rights in
Sudan.
General Observations
1-
Several Human Rights activists note the abuses of
Human Rights without sufficient attention to certain realities.
Unless the civil war stops, there will always be abuse of Human
Rights by all parties to the conflict. The recent Declaration of the
COMBONI Missionaries (19 January 2001) is a case in point.
2-
Basic Freedoms in non-combatant areas could only be
protected if all concerned renounce violence.
3-
The International Community’s concern for:
·
Human Rights.
·
Humanitarian relief.
Will be no more than isolated, ineffective do gooding, unless
accompanied by a serious concern for, and pressure towards,
cease-fire, renunciation of violence, respect for Human Rights, and
Basic Freedoms, and serious negotiations to achieve a Comprehensive
Political Agreement. These measures should be conceived as a
package, and an efficient mechanism for their realization should be
sought. It is time that concern for Human Rights move from the
micro- level to the macro- level.
The
Umma Party is seeking a National, Regional and International
coalition to resolve Sudan’s crisis through the two key processes:
Peace, and Democratic Transformation. Without them all efforts would
be doomed to fail.
UMMA PARTY
|